Changes

→‎Richard Dawkins: Dawkins calls Pope 'stupid'
Line 605: Line 605:     
===[[Richard Dawkins]]===
 
===[[Richard Dawkins]]===
 +
*Dawkins calls Pope stupid [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1166403/The-Pope-stupid-says-atheist-campaigner-Richard-Dawkins-pontiffs-claim-condoms-increase-AIDS.html]
 
*'''[[Church of England|Anglican]] [[Spiritual]] Leader Slams Popular [[Atheist]] Writers''' ''[[Fox News Channel|Fox News]]'' [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301597,00.html] <br> [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] Rowan Williams, criticized popular [[atheist]] writers such as [[Richard Dawkins]] and said "they misunderstand [[religious]] beliefs and unfairly portray [[faith]] in [[God]] as 'an eccentric survival strategy.'"
 
*'''[[Church of England|Anglican]] [[Spiritual]] Leader Slams Popular [[Atheist]] Writers''' ''[[Fox News Channel|Fox News]]'' [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301597,00.html] <br> [[Archbishop of Canterbury]] Rowan Williams, criticized popular [[atheist]] writers such as [[Richard Dawkins]] and said "they misunderstand [[religious]] beliefs and unfairly portray [[faith]] in [[God]] as 'an eccentric survival strategy.'"
 
*Here's one example of why [[Wikipedia]] is declining:  it has locked its entry about [[Richard Dawkins]] to censor one of his quotes, despite being verified with a reference.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&diff=next&oldid=162688862]  Perhaps the [[atheists]] on [[Wikipedia]] don't want people to learn what Dawkins said.
 
*Here's one example of why [[Wikipedia]] is declining:  it has locked its entry about [[Richard Dawkins]] to censor one of his quotes, despite being verified with a reference.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Dawkins&diff=next&oldid=162688862]  Perhaps the [[atheists]] on [[Wikipedia]] don't want people to learn what Dawkins said.
 
*'''[[Richard Dawkins]] is angered by a new movie criticizing evolutionists.''' [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/science/27expelled.html]  The [[New York Times]] calls vocal [[atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] an "eminent scientist" and an "evolutionary biologist," when in fact Dawkins is merely a Museum "professor" in "Public Understanding of Science," outside of any respectable university science department and donated by an ally "with the express intention that its first holder should be [[Richard Dawkins]]." [http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/aims/index.shtml]  No reputable [[American]] university would allow such favoritism; see our article on [[Scientific dogmatism]].
 
*'''[[Richard Dawkins]] is angered by a new movie criticizing evolutionists.''' [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/27/science/27expelled.html]  The [[New York Times]] calls vocal [[atheist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] an "eminent scientist" and an "evolutionary biologist," when in fact Dawkins is merely a Museum "professor" in "Public Understanding of Science," outside of any respectable university science department and donated by an ally "with the express intention that its first holder should be [[Richard Dawkins]]." [http://www.simonyi.ox.ac.uk/aims/index.shtml]  No reputable [[American]] university would allow such favoritism; see our article on [[Scientific dogmatism]].
 +
 
===[[John Edwards]]===
 
===[[John Edwards]]===
 
* Questions still remain as Edwards mistress Rielle Hunter's, celebrates daughter's first birthday without dad. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,505142,00.html]
 
* Questions still remain as Edwards mistress Rielle Hunter's, celebrates daughter's first birthday without dad. [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,505142,00.html]
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682

edits