Changes

Line 461: Line 461:  
Periodically criticism of Mormons concerning long-ago polygamy is inserted into this entry, but we're not going to allow liberal bias against Mormons here.  Should we bash [[FDR]] for having the equivalent of two wives first???--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:24, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
 
Periodically criticism of Mormons concerning long-ago polygamy is inserted into this entry, but we're not going to allow liberal bias against Mormons here.  Should we bash [[FDR]] for having the equivalent of two wives first???--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:24, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::polygamy was a core Mormon belief and a requirement to be a Mormon leader before 1890. If Conservapedia doesn't tell the facts on how the Church rejected polygamy then some readers will harbor seriously mistaken views about Mormons (as Romney discovered last year). Indeed many religious conservatives today have a very negative view of Mormons. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:50, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::polygamy was a core Mormon belief and a requirement to be a Mormon leader before 1890. If Conservapedia doesn't tell the facts on how the Church rejected polygamy then some readers will harbor seriously mistaken views about Mormons (as Romney discovered last year). Indeed many religious conservatives today have a very negative view of Mormons. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:50, 9 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: For the vast majority of its existence this Church has rejected polygamy.  The smear of Romney and the other editorializing have been removed.  Now how about featuring in the entry on [[FDR]] how he maintained the equivalent of two wives?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:21, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,505

edits