Changes

Line 464: Line 464:  
::: For the vast majority of its existence this Church has rejected polygamy.  The smear of Romney and the other editorializing have been removed.  Now how about featuring in the entry on [[FDR]] how he maintained the equivalent of two wives?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:21, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::: For the vast majority of its existence this Church has rejected polygamy.  The smear of Romney and the other editorializing have been removed.  Now how about featuring in the entry on [[FDR]] how he maintained the equivalent of two wives?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:21, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::::what we have is a very strong anti-Mormon sentiment among fundamentalists and evangelicals--CP's readership base.  They tell horror stories about polygamy and if CP ignores the issue it will be that much worse for the Mormons. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:55, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::::what we have is a very strong anti-Mormon sentiment among fundamentalists and evangelicals--CP's readership base.  They tell horror stories about polygamy and if CP ignores the issue it will be that much worse for the Mormons. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 15:55, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::: We're not ignoring the issue, but we're not going to exaggerate liberal smears either.  The entry should remain factual and not exaggerate an issue as liberals want.  The opposition by some evangelicals to this Church has nothing to do with polygamy, by the way.
 +
 +
::::: Why aren't you just as concerned about writing about [[FDR]]'s de facto polygamy, which occurred decades after this Church banned it for its members?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:07, 10 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits