Changes

Talk:World History Homework Ten Answers - Student Two (view source)

Revision as of 17:35, April 20, 2009

594 bytes added , 17:35, April 20, 2009

reply re: evolution

Line 2: Line 2:

But I don't see why creation must necessarily be direct, rather than through evolution. I already consider literal Adam and Eve and original sin to be foregone conclusions. My question is why living organisms need to be separately created. I want to understand why creationists reject this possibility. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 16:21, 19 April 2009 (EDT)

+

: Several reasons for rejecting it:

+

:* it's virtually impossible to construct the complex from the simple. No one would build a car from a bicycle, for example.

+

:* evolution requires enormous time even if it were possible, time that contradicts evidence and the Bible

+

:* flooding, which is occurs often (and was referenced by Jesus), destroys any possibility of an evolutionary process

+

:* there are too many [[Counterexamples of Evolution]] for it to be plausible

+

:* why the urge to embrace an atheistic, deceit-ridden theory?

+

:--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:35, 20 April 2009 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,370

edits