19,576
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 13:54, April 26, 2009
, 13:54, April 26, 2009no edit summary
:* Agree. Excellent proposal. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:35, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. Excellent proposal. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 08:35, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}
{{fa|Prime number|
{{fa|Prime number|
:* Agree. Probably the most exemplary article on how to pitch math at multiple levels of understanding. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:32, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. Probably the most exemplary article on how to pitch math at multiple levels of understanding. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:32, 12 March 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}
== Current article ==
{{fa|Pat Tillman|
:* Agree. It would not be the lengthiest article but good nonetheless--[[User:Jpatt|jpatt]] 01:47, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. I like the idea of highlighting the "unsung" heroes. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 06:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 08:10, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 09:18, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Missing rank and medals. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 20:08, 19 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
== Future articles ==
== Future articles ==
'''New suggestions can be added at the ''end'' of this list.'''
'''New suggestions can be added at the ''end'' of this list.'''
{{fa|Niccolò Machiavelli|
{{fa|Niccolò Machiavelli|
:* Agree. Now that it has one of my favorite crosses. --[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 06:43, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Agree. Now that it has one of my favorite crosses. --[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 06:43, 8 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. List of crosses is incomplete. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 20:10, 19 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. List of crosses is incomplete. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geoff Plourde]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 20:10, 19 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. It is lacking any explanation of how the various crosses came about, or their history (for e.g. why the Cross of Lorainne has two beams). Also, what about things like the Cross of St. Andrew? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:30, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disagree. It is lacking any explanation of how the various crosses came about, or their history (for e.g. why the Cross of Lorainne has two beams). Also, what about things like the Cross of St. Andrew? --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]</sup> 03:30, 20 April 2009 (EDT) Improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 09:54, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disgree. needs deeper history; artwork is ok but more is needed, & it should be dated and related to schools of art. --[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 03:51, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
:* Disgree. needs deeper history; artwork is ok but more is needed, & it should be dated and related to schools of art. --[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 03:51, 20 April 2009 (EDT)
}}
}}