Changes

Line 195: Line 195:     
::::: Rather than answer my two simple questions, or be substantive, you resort to a question rant.  Surely you don't think Pauli's formulation is perfect, and incapable of improvement.  No, your real position seems to be that a ''conservative'' cannot possibly improve on it!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:23, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
 
::::: Rather than answer my two simple questions, or be substantive, you resort to a question rant.  Surely you don't think Pauli's formulation is perfect, and incapable of improvement.  No, your real position seems to be that a ''conservative'' cannot possibly improve on it!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:23, 28 April 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::: Two answer your two questions:
 +
::::::*Do you ever ''apply'' the Bible in your quest for the truth? - '''Yes'''
 +
::::::*Do you earnestly seek the truth? - '''Yes'''
 +
::::::Now, here are mine:
 +
::::::*Do you try to ''apply'' the Bible to physics?
 +
::::::*Do you think you are the one to improve Pauli's formulation of Einstein's postulates substantially? The same formulations which are around for a century and used by physicists around the world? Endorsed by the leading scientist of his time? Please, do yourself a favor, and ask some actual physicists  what they think about your version...
 +
:::::: [[User:ClementB|Clement ♗]] 00:03, 29 April 2009 (EDT)
    
== Regarding Trotsky ==
 
== Regarding Trotsky ==
178

edits