Changes

==Summation==

==Summation==

While revisionists make various and contradictory attempts to disallow Romans 1 from being a general condemnation of male and female homosexual relations, traditionalists provide evidence that such prohomosex arguments are invalid. As Gagnon, concludes,  

While revisionists make various and contradictory attempts to disallow Romans 1 from being a general condemnation of male and female homosexual relations, traditionalists provide evidence that such prohomosex arguments are invalid. As Gagnon concludes,  

"Every piece of evidence that can be culled from the text’s literary and historical context confirms that the Bible’s prohibition of homosexual practice, like its prohibition of adult incestuous unions, is absolute, rejecting all forms of homosexual practice regardless of consent and commitment."<ref>Gagnon, What the Evidence Really Says about Scripture and Homosexual Practice: Five Issues</ref>

"Every piece of evidence that can be culled from the text’s literary and historical context confirms that the Bible’s prohibition of homosexual practice, like its prohibition of adult incestuous unions, is absolute, rejecting all forms of homosexual practice regardless of consent and commitment."<ref>Gagnon, What the Evidence Really Says about Scripture and Homosexual Practice: Five Issues</ref>