119
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 40:
Line 40: +
Talk:United States Constitution (view source)
Revision as of 20:48, May 11, 2009
, 20:48, May 11, 2009→Exactly How were My Edits Wrong?
It is true that the delegates were acting illegally by writing the Constitution up during the conventions. It is also true that the ratification clause for adopting the Constitution was illegal as it undermined the law already in place, the Articles of the Confederation. Please, tell me why these were removed. [[User:Avalerion|Avalerion]]
It is true that the delegates were acting illegally by writing the Constitution up during the conventions. It is also true that the ratification clause for adopting the Constitution was illegal as it undermined the law already in place, the Articles of the Confederation. Please, tell me why these were removed. [[User:Avalerion|Avalerion]]
::because they reject American values. This is a conservative encyclopedia and we don't allow anti-Americanism. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:38, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
::because they reject American values. This is a conservative encyclopedia and we don't allow anti-Americanism. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:38, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
:::I am not anti-American and that comment did not reject American values! If anything, it upheld the truth about what happened and being TRUTHFUL is Christian, which is where America gained its founding. Conservatism's core does NOT change over time, like truth, and to do otherwise is to break the very definition of it. If I was to say that Obama lied during his campaign, that is truth and it is not anti-American to expose it. [[User:Avalerion|Avalerion]]