Changes

Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)

Revision as of 16:57, May 12, 2009

645 bytes removed , 16:57, May 12, 2009

remove personal attack

Line 664: Line 664:

For information this math proof was written on Wikipedia about two years ago and they squelched the truth in science by a vote of 8 to 1, and even though a supposed expert in relativity wrote that the math proofs did in fact prove relativity to be totally wrong, in the end he chose to live a lie and to squelch the truth.

In the end you can also squelch truth in real science by determining that truth by the undeniable science and math facts written here or to live according to truth. Either is your choice but squelching will only suppress science facts and true science. So I am going to write the science and math that shows undeniable truth and you can decide. [[User:StevenCrum|StevenCrum]] 16:31, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

−

:Yeah. Sure. You, with only a mediocre grasp on the process of writing have a proof simple enough to put on wikipedia, yet it has evaded the planet's most brilliant scientists and mathematicians, essentially the brightest men in human history, for a century. I'd like to see this. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 17:57, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

−

::Okay, I did some basic googling, and find that you've been going on about this for several years now, but have a pitifully poor grasp of relativistic theory. Well... welcome to Conservapedia, I guess. We're nothing if not openminded. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 18:03, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

== More regarding the criticism of LIGO ==

Ed Poor

Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

30,650

edits