7
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 173:
Line 173: + +
Debate:Is global warming evident, and if so, is this the fault of man, and how must man stop it? (view source)
Revision as of 13:33, March 26, 2007
, 13:33, March 26, 2007→No
:What you stand on is not science at all, but grant-moneyed political pabulum and [[propaganda]]. ''I'' have no respect for them who accuse me falsely--not merely of "denial," as you put it, but of an intentional tort against the environment. For that is the accusation you continue to make.
:What you stand on is not science at all, but grant-moneyed political pabulum and [[propaganda]]. ''I'' have no respect for them who accuse me falsely--not merely of "denial," as you put it, but of an intentional tort against the environment. For that is the accusation you continue to make.
:As for granting me the last word--is that a promise?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
:As for granting me the last word--is that a promise?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:01, 23 March 2007 (EDT)
I personally am very skeptical of the current "global warming" frenzy. It just doesn't appear to have much solidity to it, and even if the earth is warming, the environment is highly self-regulatory. Warmer temperatures mean increased evaporation. Now it is true that water vapor is a greenhouse gas, but as it condense in the atmosphere, it forms clouds, which block the suns rays, dim the surface, and effectively lower temperatures. I personally believe that the earth might warm, but only to a certain point, at which natural systems would work to cool it again. --[[User:Blu Aardvark|Blu Aardvark]] 09:33, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
== Yes ==
== Yes ==