Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
6,631
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:It's all very well to laugh, but perhaps you could work to improve what you think is lacking instead? New contributors are always welcome here.
:It's all very well to laugh, but perhaps you could work to improve what you think is lacking instead? New contributors are always welcome here.
:Also note that Conservapedia doesn't claim to be unbiased - it openly has a declared US conservative point of view. Otherwise it would have to be called Unbiasedopaedia!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:49, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
:Also note that Conservapedia doesn't claim to be unbiased - it openly has a declared US conservative point of view. Otherwise it would have to be called Unbiasedopaedia!--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 07:49, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
::Right. Wikipedia says "we're neutral" and then they insert and defend bias. We basically say up front "we're biased!" which is not true bias, but declared POV. [[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] 11:53, 21 May 2009 (EDT)