Changes

596 bytes added ,  00:00, March 27, 2007
Line 392: Line 392:  
:::''"many persons who self-identify as 'liberal' oppose American foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy."'''
 
:::''"many persons who self-identify as 'liberal' oppose American foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy."'''
 
:::This is not my invention; it is thier own language and actions.  And further evidence is added by the fact that while in 2003, extreme elements who may not have been ''real liberals'', initiated this opposition movement. Since then however, more moderate elements, many likewise claiming the mantle of "liberal", now actively advocate withdrawing support from a liberal democracy elected by universal suffarage.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:21, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::This is not my invention; it is thier own language and actions.  And further evidence is added by the fact that while in 2003, extreme elements who may not have been ''real liberals'', initiated this opposition movement. Since then however, more moderate elements, many likewise claiming the mantle of "liberal", now actively advocate withdrawing support from a liberal democracy elected by universal suffarage.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:21, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::The problem is that Fisk et al. just don't believe the president when he says that he does it to further human rights. Maybe they are even in favor of policy that advaces human right they just don't see it in the policies of the president. If anything it should be ''Refusal to see the current foreign policy to advance human rights''.[[User:Order]] 27 March.
 +
::::A problem for the current adimintration is that the elected government, and the majority of Iraqis also want the Americans to leave. You might argue that this is not wise to do, but hey still want it. [[User:Order]] 27 March.
    
===Discussion===
 
===Discussion===
2,002

edits