Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎A sense of "loyal"?: reply ... not quite qualifying
Line 183: Line 183:     
Another possibility for 17th century: "loyal" with the meaning "1. True to obligations of duty, love, etc.; faithful to plighted troth", which dates to Othello in 1604 (OED).  The earlier meanings are from the 16th century and deal with loyalty to a nation or sovereign, but it seems to me that this represents a quite distinct conservative insight.  Perhaps add both uses?
 
Another possibility for 17th century: "loyal" with the meaning "1. True to obligations of duty, love, etc.; faithful to plighted troth", which dates to Othello in 1604 (OED).  The earlier meanings are from the 16th century and deal with loyalty to a nation or sovereign, but it seems to me that this represents a quite distinct conservative insight.  Perhaps add both uses?
 +
 +
:Fascinating suggestion!  But the earlier uses go back to 1531 and are not that different.  The OED may be acting partial to Shakespeare in giving credit.
 +
 +
:Also note that 1604 is before the writing of the [[King James Bible]], further disqualifying this suggestion.  I think we could go with something like 1610, because by then the [[King James Bible]] was virtually complete albeit not yet published, but 1604 is really too early for this list.
 +
 +
:Do have any more suggestions?  I learned from this one.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:17, 12 June 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,910

edits

Navigation menu