Changes

→‎Biblical: please add!
Line 40: Line 40:     
Almost forgot what I came to the article for in the first place!  Would the origin of "Biblical" (1780-1790, according to Random House) qualify for this list?  It certainly surprised me!  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 16:40, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
 
Almost forgot what I came to the article for in the first place!  Would the origin of "Biblical" (1780-1790, according to Random House) qualify for this list?  It certainly surprised me!  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 16:40, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Yes.  Wow, that is surprising!  Please add it.  Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:04, 14 June 2009 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,530

edits