Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
30 bytes added ,  18:16, June 15, 2009
→‎Morality based on theistic religion: internal links; also, fixed "former" and "latter"
Line 21: Line 21:  
{{QuoteBox|Evil and good do objectively exist because they emanate from the fact that there is an unchanging, omniscient (all-knowing), and holy God.  These are not subjective opinions invented and written down by man.  Rather, ‘good’ expresses the innate characteristics of God Himself that He has built into every human being, and every human being is responsible to live up to those standards. And the absence of good defines evil.<ref>Ramsey, 2004</ref>}}
 
{{QuoteBox|Evil and good do objectively exist because they emanate from the fact that there is an unchanging, omniscient (all-knowing), and holy God.  These are not subjective opinions invented and written down by man.  Rather, ‘good’ expresses the innate characteristics of God Himself that He has built into every human being, and every human being is responsible to live up to those standards. And the absence of good defines evil.<ref>Ramsey, 2004</ref>}}
   −
One standard objection to this view is the Euthyphro dilemma, posed by Socrates in the dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks whether a thing is made pious (or just, right) because the Gods love (approve of, command) it, or if the Gods love certain things because they are just and right.  If the latter, then it seems that God's commands would not be objectively valid, but arbitrary whims.  If the former, then morality has an independent existence from God's commands; God is good because God always does the right thing, but they are not made the right thing simply because God commanded them.  Morality would then need to have some further, independent ground which might be discoverable independent of religion.
+
One standard objection to this view is the [[Euthyphro]] dilemma, posed by Socrates in the dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks whether a thing is made pious (or just, right) because [[Divine command theory|the Gods love (approve of, command) it]], or if the Gods love certain things because they are just and right.  If the former, then it seems that God's commands would not be objectively valid, but arbitrary whims.  If the latter, then morality has an independent existence from God's commands; God is good because God always does the right thing, but they are not made the right thing simply because God commanded them.  Morality would then need to have some further, independent ground which might be discoverable independent of religion.
    
==Morality based on evolution==
 
==Morality based on evolution==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,026

edits

Navigation menu