Changes

:::::Oh Saddam was the West's darling in the 80s. And Rumsfeld gave him useful information and weapons in addition to a handshake. But again, neither of them was pro-Ba'athis. They were choosing the lesser evil. [[User:Order]] 27 March.

:::::Oh Saddam was the West's darling in the 80s. And Rumsfeld gave him useful information and weapons in addition to a handshake. But again, neither of them was pro-Ba'athis. They were choosing the lesser evil. [[User:Order]] 27 March.

::::::You've said it twice now [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal&diff=66076&oldid=66039][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal&diff=next&oldid=67302] of fascism and democracy, fascism is the lesser of two evils.  You've convinced me to reinsert the passage.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

::::::You've said it twice now [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal&diff=66076&oldid=66039][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal&diff=next&oldid=67302] of fascism and democracy, fascism is the lesser of two evils.  You've convinced me to reinsert the passage.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 20:41, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

:::::::The choice wasn't between fascism and democracy. In the 80s it was a choice between Iraqi fascism and Iranian theocracy and in this decade between state violence by Saddam  and civil war between Sunnis and Shia. And don't claim that nobody could have predicted it. Many did. For example a conservative German politician, Toedenhoefer who said (figuratively)  ''before'' the war that every day of war in Iraq will lead to one year of terrorism in the Middle East. So, there were concerned people, before the war who weren't liberal, who found it tough to choose between chaos, and Saddam. [User:Order]] 27 March, 13:15 (AEST)

:::::::The choice wasn't between fascism and democracy. In the 80s it was a choice between Iraqi fascism and Iranian theocracy and in this decade between state violence by Saddam  and civil war between Sunnis and Shia. And don't claim that nobody could have predicted it. Many did. For example a conservative German politician, Toedenhoefer who said (figuratively)  ''before'' the war that every day of war in Iraq will lead to one year of terrorism in the Middle East. So, there were concerned people, before the war, who weren't liberal, who found it tough to choose between chaos and Saddam. [User:Order]] 27 March, 13:15 (AEST)

*We again have too beasts here.  It isn't fair to Clinton, per se, to say that. Clinton, if not distracted with his perjury before a Federal Circuit Judge, which is what he was really scared of, not Impeachment, for it was a true Felony, would undoubtedly followed State's advisory and entered the fray in Africa.  We have been working hard, for years, to remove the domestic idealogy from our Foreign Policy...as it costs us billions every year.  The Congress was surprisingly open to aid packages when requested, by Clinton.

*We again have too beasts here.  It isn't fair to Clinton, per se, to say that. Clinton, if not distracted with his perjury before a Federal Circuit Judge, which is what he was really scared of, not Impeachment, for it was a true Felony, would undoubtedly followed State's advisory and entered the fray in Africa.  We have been working hard, for years, to remove the domestic idealogy from our Foreign Policy...as it costs us billions every year.  The Congress was surprisingly open to aid packages when requested, by Clinton.