Changes

"judicial taking" usage shows how a conservative insight develops and grows
Line 20: Line 20:  
|-
 
|-
 
|1900s
 
|1900s
−
|100
+
|101
 
|-
 
|-
 
|2000s
 
|2000s
Line 449: Line 449:  
|2004
 
|2004
 
|One who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).<ref>A similar yet different concept, "judicial supremacy," was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).</ref>
 
|One who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).<ref>A similar yet different concept, "judicial supremacy," was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).</ref>
 +
|-
 +
|judicial taking
 +
|1982
 +
|The concept was introduced, without using the term, by conservative Justice Potter Stewart in 1967, and then used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in 1982, and then used often in law review articles an Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then in a case before the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] in 2009.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|junk science
 
|junk science
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits