Changes

no edit summary
Line 231: Line 231:  
I don't seek a confrontation, you are a valued contributor, but Chip, Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?  That edit, and some other recent ones of yours that I have reverted, make me think you are sourcing liberals for that kind of revisionist thinking!  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:31, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
 
I don't seek a confrontation, you are a valued contributor, but Chip, Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?  That edit, and some other recent ones of yours that I have reverted, make me think you are sourcing liberals for that kind of revisionist thinking!  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:31, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
   −
:TK, there's no sarcasm here, but when you asked the question "Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?" that sounds as if your saying I wrote that Ronald Reagan was not a fiscal conservative, I wrote that he is. Then a user who has a history of committing vandalism took my edit off, and you changed it back. Just what are you implying? Also, I checked out your recent contributions and you have not reverted any of my edits. Is this for real or is this some kind of a joke?[[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] July 18, 2009
+
:TK, there's no sarcasm here, but when you asked the question "Ronald Reagan was not a Fiscal Conservative?" that sounds as if your saying I wrote that Ronald Reagan was not a fiscal conservative, I wrote that he is. Then a user who has a history of committing vandalism took my edit off, and you changed it back. Just what are you implying? Also, I checked out your recent contributions and you have not reverted any of my edits. Is this for real or is this some kind of a joke? [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] July 18, 2009
    
::No joke, just my being distracted and confused about where I was posting, I guess.  I can see that you were indeed the placer of the category, not the idiot I blocked for removing it.....sorry.  The only reversion I have done of your edits had to do with Sarah Palin, and it was minor.  I will pay better attention before posting in the future, Chip.  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:35, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
 
::No joke, just my being distracted and confused about where I was posting, I guess.  I can see that you were indeed the placer of the category, not the idiot I blocked for removing it.....sorry.  The only reversion I have done of your edits had to do with Sarah Palin, and it was minor.  I will pay better attention before posting in the future, Chip.  --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 23:35, 18 July 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
I understand going after the constant vandals on this site can get distracting, thanks for clarifying TK. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] July 18, 2009
Siteadmin, oversight, Administrators
5,098

edits