Changes

no edit summary
Line 60: Line 60:  
:::It could still be a "god" in a metaphorical sense like the one I presented above. Maybe someone who has read her book can clarify this? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:34, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::It could still be a "god" in a metaphorical sense like the one I presented above. Maybe someone who has read her book can clarify this? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:34, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::::Yes, that would be most helpful-- As would a note in the article to the same extent. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::::Yes, that would be most helpful-- As would a note in the article to the same extent. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::::What Coulter has said in her book, which I own, is that liberals have created false gods out of their predecessors.  People like the old Marxist communists and musicians like John Lennon.  They treat these men like martyrs and saints, beyond reproach and utterly infallible.  They idolize and glorify them, like the posters of Che Guevera.  These are the altars to which they pray.  Das Kapitalis is their bible.  Abortion is their sacrament.  Mother Nature is their most Supreme Being.  They live and die for Her.  It is indeed atheistic because their "gods" are not spiritual gods, but men and '''things''' that have come before them. [[User:TheHeroExcelsior|TheHeroExcelsior]] 10:03, 9 September 2009 (EDT)