Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎yes...: From www.wikireason.org which is in the public domain
Line 3: Line 3:       −
== yes... ==
+
== Yes ==
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Arguments for * All life on Earth shares common ancestor
 +
 
 +
*All life on Earth shares common ancestor
 +
#All life on Earth shares molecular features.
 +
##Same macromolecules (DNA, RNA, protein)
 +
##Same monomers for those macromolecules (five nucleotides, twenty standard amino acids)
 +
##Same chirality of molecules. DNA in all complex life forms is right-handed, research suggests[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9802E1DB1F3DF936A15751C0A9659C8B63] that left-handed DNA would work just as well.
 +
###If life forms did not have common ancestors we would expect to see a fairly even distribution of left and right handed DNA.
 +
##Genetic system:
 +
##*Ribosome structure
 +
##*tRNA structure
 +
##*The universal genetic code (and slight deviations from it)
 +
##*Information encoded in nucleotide polymers (DNA or RNA).
 +
#Differences between organisms can be explained by known mechanisms of genetic mutation.
 +
#*'''Counter:''' There has not been enough time for mutation to generate existing biological diversity.
 +
#**'''Counter:''' There has been enough time enough time to generate existing biological diversity.
 +
#*#The speed of evolution is measured by the [[w:Darwin (unit)|darwin]] (change in an organism's character by a factor of e per million years.) [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section5.html#morphological_rates]
 +
#*#Evolution in the lab can be as high as 200,000 darwins.
 +
#*#As measured by the fossil record, the average evolutionary rate in the wild is 370 darwins.
 +
#*#A rate of 400 darwins is capable of turning a mouse into an elephant in just 10,000 years.
 +
#*No other (non-human) process has been observed to generate biological diversity.
 +
#*Extensive biological diversity existed before humans had the ability to create new forms by molecular recombination.
    
>95% of academic biologists support it.
 
>95% of academic biologists support it.
Line 54: Line 78:     
[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]]
 
[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]]
      
==no...==
 
==no...==

Navigation menu