Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 72:
Line 72: + + + + + +
→A British Wikipedian says
"Wikipedia articles and categories cannot be used as sources."
"Wikipedia articles and categories cannot be used as sources."
: OK, we're making progress. We both agree that Wikipedia is more liberal than the American public.
: Doesn't our entry [[liberal]] define the term? I'll check after posting this. A meaningful definition would have to include censorship of prayer from the classroom, even when every single parent, student and teacher wants a prayer, and forced taxpayer-funding of abortion, even for taxpayers who morally object.
: Wikipedia's byzantine rules are only selectively enforced in a way that reflects its bias. One of my major objections is how Wikipedia does allow, and even implicitly encourages, the citation of journalistic opinion as fact. In this manner many factual assertions presented in Wikipedia are, upon further investigation, merely a liberal opinion that was published somewhere.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:44, 28 March 2007 (EDT)