1
edit
Changes
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 00:29, October 7, 2009
, 00:29, October 7, 2009→View from a longtime Wikipedian
:Incidental bias, what a lovely word. Maybe you would think different if you read http://www.conservapedia.com/Bias_in_Wikipedia They have the most pages on the internet, clap clap clap. I truly believe they have the most anti-God pages as well. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:44, 21 June 2009 (EDT)
:Incidental bias, what a lovely word. Maybe you would think different if you read http://www.conservapedia.com/Bias_in_Wikipedia They have the most pages on the internet, clap clap clap. I truly believe they have the most anti-God pages as well. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 00:44, 21 June 2009 (EDT)
:::::Likeminded people who agree with Osirus1723, where is the external link section of Wikipedia's Criticism of atheism article located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism Why don't you test your hypothesis that the ideological bias at Wikipedia is incidental? Test it as soon as you read this message by adding a external link section to the Wikipedia criticism of atheism article located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 05:04, 21 June 2009 (EDT)
:::::Likeminded people who agree with Osirus1723, where is the external link section of Wikipedia's Criticism of atheism article located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism Why don't you test your hypothesis that the ideological bias at Wikipedia is incidental? Test it as soon as you read this message by adding a external link section to the Wikipedia criticism of atheism article located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_atheism [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 05:04, 21 June 2009 (EDT)
Whaaat? "Conservapedia was, I understand, created to be an academic resource that avoided some of the pitfalls of Wikipedia, such as anonymous editing (which I am glad this encyclopaedia avoids)." This is, IN NO WAY, an "academic resource." Put your head on straight PLEASE. The bible is no more than a book. The world doesn't care if you want to be backwards and dumb but for God's sake, keep it to yourselves. No need to slather it all over the internet. Most people, for your information, look at this site to laugh our asses off because you are just plain retarded. Congrats! You have de-evolved yourselves. You should be proud. Oh, and your grammar sucks balls, especially on the high-interest topics such as abortion, Obama, evolution etc. Just for future reference, if you have poor grammar, you're much less likely to be taken seriously (although, you're not taken very seriously in the first place.) Cheers!