| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | 1. A consumer's overall satisfaction is expressed in economics as his '''total utility'''. | | 1. A consumer's overall satisfaction is expressed in economics as his '''total utility'''. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Correct. |
| | | | |
| | 2. If I were to buy the car for $9,000 instead of the $10,000 I was willing to pay for the car...then I would have saved $1,000! The "consumer surplus" concept means that if I am willing to pay up to a certain amount for something and I actually pay less for it, then I have actually saved a few dollars. | | 2. If I were to buy the car for $9,000 instead of the $10,000 I was willing to pay for the car...then I would have saved $1,000! The "consumer surplus" concept means that if I am willing to pay up to a certain amount for something and I actually pay less for it, then I have actually saved a few dollars. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Good. Just to be clear: the "consumer surplus" is $1000 here. |
| | | | |
| | 3. If I were to hike and read for 5 hours, to get the maximum utility out of that time I would have to hike for an hour, then read, hike, read, then hike again. By alternating between the two activities I could maximize my total utility because each time I hike and then read the activity would seem fresh again. So, imagine that I have hiked for an hour and I start to feel tired, so then I get out my book for an hour...feeling refreshed, I hike for another hour, which I believe would still hold the 10 utility points because it is like starting a fresh activity, then if I read again, it also would keep its maximum utility points of 6 because it would be like starting a new activity and would be welcome after the long hour of hiking! So, adding up the utility points for those 5 hours I would get 42 utility points for my total utility. However, just supposing that both the activities WERE to decline in utility for those five hours, I would then have to hike for two hours, then read for 2, then hike for one more hour. The total utility would then be: 34 | | 3. If I were to hike and read for 5 hours, to get the maximum utility out of that time I would have to hike for an hour, then read, hike, read, then hike again. By alternating between the two activities I could maximize my total utility because each time I hike and then read the activity would seem fresh again. So, imagine that I have hiked for an hour and I start to feel tired, so then I get out my book for an hour...feeling refreshed, I hike for another hour, which I believe would still hold the 10 utility points because it is like starting a fresh activity, then if I read again, it also would keep its maximum utility points of 6 because it would be like starting a new activity and would be welcome after the long hour of hiking! So, adding up the utility points for those 5 hours I would get 42 utility points for my total utility. However, just supposing that both the activities WERE to decline in utility for those five hours, I would then have to hike for two hours, then read for 2, then hike for one more hour. The total utility would then be: 34 |
| | + | |
| | + | :Your last sentence is correct. You'd still get tired more easily hiking the third hour even if you took a break and read first. |
| | | | |
| | 4. In order to get the best deal out of the slightly used car, I should ask the dealer to sell it used, not new. | | 4. In order to get the best deal out of the slightly used car, I should ask the dealer to sell it used, not new. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Need to explain this economically: the dealer should lower his price for you. (Minus 1). |
| | | | |
| | 5. The indifference curves are straight lines because no matter where the person is, on either of the lines, they prefer the good/service just the same as before. | | 5. The indifference curves are straight lines because no matter where the person is, on either of the lines, they prefer the good/service just the same as before. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Not explained precisely. Be sure to review the model answers when available Sunday night. (Minus 2). |
| | | | |
| | 6. The income effect is the effect that the price of a good/service has on our income. If the price of something increases, our income will decrease, if the price of the good/service decreases, our income will increase. | | 6. The income effect is the effect that the price of a good/service has on our income. If the price of something increases, our income will decrease, if the price of the good/service decreases, our income will increase. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Good, but could also link to Law of Demand. (No points deducted). |
| | | | |
| | 7. I think charity relies on the free market because if the free market did not exist, then charity would not exist. | | 7. I think charity relies on the free market because if the free market did not exist, then charity would not exist. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Good, could use as a model. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Score: 67/70. Good answers, and fine overall effort!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:18, 11 October 2009 (EDT) |