Changes

Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)

Revision as of 03:17, October 16, 2009

411 bytes added , 03:17, October 16, 2009

→‎Quantum Field Theory/Changes to the Intro: For something supposedly so essential for 150 years, don't you find it odd that you cannot cite anything of value that has come from it???

Line 974: Line 974:

:::: Mathematically, special relativity is tangent to general relativity. I am just using common terminology. If you don't believe relativity, that is your business, but it is essential for all of physics in the last 150 years. And yes, it is needed to understand the electromagnetism used in computers. I suggest you find sources for your statements. I repeat, I count 8 false and unsourced sentences just in the first couple of paragraphs. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 22:59, 15 October 2009 (EDT)

+

::::: The claim that relativity "is essential for all of physics in the last 150 years" is a standard over-the-top assertion of those who were fed it in school and have never reconsidered since. The truth is no one can cite a single achievement of value by the theory. For something supposedly so essential for 150 years, don't you find it odd that you cannot cite anything of value that has come from it???

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,530

edits