1,792
edits
Changes
Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)
Revision as of 03:38, October 16, 2009
, 03:38, October 16, 2009→Quantum Field Theory/Changes to the Intro: I was just pointing out errors in the article
::::: The claim that relativity "is essential for all of physics in the last 150 years" is a standard over-the-top assertion of those who were fed it in school and have never reconsidered since. The truth is no one can cite a single achievement of value by the theory. For something supposedly so essential for 150 years, don't you find it odd that you cannot cite anything of value that has come from it???
::::: The claim that relativity "is essential for all of physics in the last 150 years" is a standard over-the-top assertion of those who were fed it in school and have never reconsidered since. The truth is no one can cite a single achievement of value by the theory. For something supposedly so essential for 150 years, don't you find it odd that you cannot cite anything of value that has come from it???
:::::: I was just pointing out errors in the article, and not trying to start a discussion on "value". [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 23:38, 15 October 2009 (EDT)