Changes

258 bytes added ,  21:58, March 28, 2007
→‎Busing & beyond!: no good to learn some straw man attacks
Line 39: Line 39:     
:: It's not extrapolation to state that what he is opposed to is prevalent in modern jurisprudence.  I realize, however, that it's probably not something you want to hear, since I'm betting you like him a lot.  Actually, he's a great justice on Admin Law... textualism works there.... but when extended into conlaw it does flow against Brown.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:29, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:: It's not extrapolation to state that what he is opposed to is prevalent in modern jurisprudence.  I realize, however, that it's probably not something you want to hear, since I'm betting you like him a lot.  Actually, he's a great justice on Admin Law... textualism works there.... but when extended into conlaw it does flow against Brown.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:29, 28 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: It has nothing to do with whether I like him or I hate him. Either way, criticism of his views should be based on what he actually said. It does the reader no good to learn some straw man attacks. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 17:58, 28 March 2007 (EDT)