Changes

reply: Let me start by saying the obvious: the Lorenzian transformation at the heart of special relativity certainly DOES assume that "v" cannot exceed "c".
Line 1,073: Line 1,073:  
      
 
      
 
: This encyclopedia is supposed to be guided by conservative principles, including the telling of objective Truth even if the Truth is politically incorrect or offensive to sensitive ears.  In this article we are seeing the complete derailing of that fundamental principle.  The article barely even describes its own subject and devotes as much space to attacking it with numerous disparaging falsehoods; all because the fact of relativity is offensive to somebody's political sensibilities and/or personal hangups.  --[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]] 13:41, 11 November 2009 (EST)
 
: This encyclopedia is supposed to be guided by conservative principles, including the telling of objective Truth even if the Truth is politically incorrect or offensive to sensitive ears.  In this article we are seeing the complete derailing of that fundamental principle.  The article barely even describes its own subject and devotes as much space to attacking it with numerous disparaging falsehoods; all because the fact of relativity is offensive to somebody's political sensibilities and/or personal hangups.  --[[User:NgSmith|NgSmith]] 13:41, 11 November 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
:: There's much verbosity in the above two posts, and I'll gradually try to weed through it.  Let me start by saying the obvious:  the Lorenzian transformation at the heart of special relativity certainly DOES assume that "v" cannot exceed "c".  The equation blows up if that assumption is violated.
 +
 +
::Now that I've addressed one of your points, how about addressing mine:  relativity has absurd physical discontinuities, as explained in the entry.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,533

edits