124
edits
Changes
Talk:Luke 17-24 (Translated) (view source)
Revision as of 02:36, November 16, 2009
, 02:36, November 16, 2009Earthly
::I do not think Mark left an abrupt ending, and better to include such, and then put a note. In fact, I still hold to my assertion that outside updating words, no real revision is necessary. The KJV does not produce liberals, though cults use it for its power, and providing sound conservative commentary is far far better than a "thought for thought" translation which does a substantial amount of revision, largely driven to prevent attempts by liberals to hijack the text.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 21:56, 26 October 2009 (EDT)
::I do not think Mark left an abrupt ending, and better to include such, and then put a note. In fact, I still hold to my assertion that outside updating words, no real revision is necessary. The KJV does not produce liberals, though cults use it for its power, and providing sound conservative commentary is far far better than a "thought for thought" translation which does a substantial amount of revision, largely driven to prevent attempts by liberals to hijack the text.[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 21:56, 26 October 2009 (EDT)
== Earthly ==
My reason for including "earthly" was that I think it incorporates the non-physical parts of the world that are sinful. Putting both the materialism and non-physical parts together makes it more complete. Also, being of the world, "earthly" or "worldly", in my mind is more economic in word use because it encompasses so much in just one word. [[User:Ameda|ameda]] 21:36, 15 November 2009 (EST)