Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,962
edits
Changes
Talk:Charles Lindbergh (view source)
Revision as of 14:01, November 22, 2009
, 14:01, November 22, 2009Burrell
Please explain how he was a hero. Why did he oppose FDR's [[foreign policy]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:35, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
Please explain how he was a hero. Why did he oppose FDR's [[foreign policy]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:35, 20 March 2009 (EDT)
==Burrell==
Jospeh Burrell's "polemic" (accordeing its own introduction [http://books.google.com/books?id=-MJacJ8GFx0C&pg=PA46&lpg=PA46&dq=Burrell,+Joseph%2BCOMMUNISM&source=bl&ots=2o82_tO0dO&sig=foh0ocbZGmWlJXfA-ZO6hfiwoBE&hl=en&ei=Pj0JS-C5ENHJlQfexcjABw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Burrell%2C%20Joseph%2BCOMMUNISM&f=true]) states on page 44, excerpted, "Despite thier apparent differences, capitalism, communism, and consevativism are all fascist systems and they are all based on the [[social drwinist]] ideas of Herbert Spencer complemented by the eugenicist ideas of Francis Galton....Make no mistake about it, the consevative ideology is very much the same as the ideology of Adolph Hitler and, though it is not as obvious, also the ideology of [[Jospeh Stalin]]...." [http://books.google.com/books?id=-MJacJ8GFx0C&pg=PA46&lpg=PA46&dq=Burrell,+Joseph%2BCOMMUNISM&source=bl&ots=2o82_tO0dO&sig=foh0ocbZGmWlJXfA-ZO6hfiwoBE&hl=en&ei=Pj0JS-C5ENHJlQfexcjABw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CAwQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Burrell%2C%20Joseph%2BCOMMUNISM&f=true]
OK, this [[liberal]] [[intellectualism]] maybe appropriate somewhere on the web, but here it's lacking encyclopedia quality and value. At least now we understand how several [[Mao]]ists can be appointed to high positions in [[Obama administration]]. But as a source for the Charles Lindbergh article, or Conservapedia as a whole, this book, and Charles Burrell don't quite stack up. Let's call it, <s>"liberal quackery."</s> marginal, fringe, partisan, extreme, and lack of a mainstream, peer reviewed, reputatable and reliable source. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 09:01, 22 November 2009 (EST)