Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
global warming bias
I strongly suggest you refrain from promulgating your opinions on the way science is performed until you take part in scientific research. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 12:32, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
I strongly suggest you refrain from promulgating your opinions on the way science is performed until you take part in scientific research. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 12:32, 3 July 2007 (EDT)
==Corruption in the process==
Articles which challenged AGW have been omitted from scientific journals on the ground that a paper which points out flaws in the prevailing theory would "not be of interest" to the scientific community the journal serves. This is obvious nonsense, but more than one journal has gotten away with it.
Also, their is the ''incestuous'' effect of passing around a paper about a controversial new theor only to '''supporters''' of that theory. Anyone with an ounce of sense in their head would realize that supporters would tend to harbor (at least unconscious) [[bias]] in favor of the theory, making their "review" utterly useless. The [[hockey stick graph]] is a case in point. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:27, 3 December 2009 (EST)