Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,206
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49:
Line 49: +
→No need to exaggerate: reply
:Good point. I'll remove it, however, Jpatt added it into the section so if he argues that it is important and he provides a reasonable need for it, it can be re-added to the article. I'd like to hear his argument for it if he has any objections. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 21:15, 3 December 2009 (EST)
:Good point. I'll remove it, however, Jpatt added it into the section so if he argues that it is important and he provides a reasonable need for it, it can be re-added to the article. I'd like to hear his argument for it if he has any objections. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 21:15, 3 December 2009 (EST)
::That's fine, likely true but unsourced.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:25, 3 December 2009 (EST)
::That's fine, likely true but unsourced.--[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 21:25, 3 December 2009 (EST)
:::That's what I was thinking, too; it very likely could be true. The Mainstream media cover-up of the entire climategate scandal as well the denial by the Obama administration, and the odd behavior from the major search engines surrounding this entire event just begs the question -- is this a worldwide scam to grab power and dictate new Leftist laws? When I get a chance I'll do some research on it and see what I can find. [[User:DerekE|DerekE]] 21:33, 3 December 2009 (EST)