Changes

Line 14: Line 14:  
|
 
|
 
|The evidence is overwhelming that verses 1 - 11 are not original to John. See [[Essay:Adulteress Story]] for an extended examination of the issues relating to this passage, including the talk pages of that essay. You can also see the wikipedia article on this story, which contains a very detailed and accurate listing of the textual evidence relating to this story.
 
|The evidence is overwhelming that verses 1 - 11 are not original to John. See [[Essay:Adulteress Story]] for an extended examination of the issues relating to this passage, including the talk pages of that essay. You can also see the wikipedia article on this story, which contains a very detailed and accurate listing of the textual evidence relating to this story.
−
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_and_the_woman_taken_in_adultery
+
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_and_the_woman_taken_in_adultery (the one note I would make relating to the textual evidence is that most scholars now agree that P66 and P75 are second century documents, not third century, as this article states).
 
See the talk page here for an explanation of my views and reasoning regarding this passage, including why I believe this event actually happened, but still hold that it should NOT be included in the bible.
 
See the talk page here for an explanation of my views and reasoning regarding this passage, including why I believe this event actually happened, but still hold that it should NOT be included in the bible.
 
|-
 
|-
Block, Automoderated users, edit
398

edits