1,792
edits
Changes
→Busing & beyond!: Lash out? I am merely removing your repeated malicious and misleading edits
: I am praying for you, RSchlafly, that your anger doesn't cause you to lash out so much anymore, and that your distrust still allows you to enjoy rational argument someday.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:08, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
: I am praying for you, RSchlafly, that your anger doesn't cause you to lash out so much anymore, and that your distrust still allows you to enjoy rational argument someday.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:08, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
:: Lash out? I am merely removing your repeated malicious and misleading edits that suggest that Scalia favored racial segregation in the 1950s. The article is about Scalia. He has been writing Supreme Court opinions for 20 years. It is fine to put in some informed commentary about his actual opinions. It is not okay to put in wild speculation about issues that Scalia never addressed. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:51, 29 March 2007 (EDT)