5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 76:
Line 76: − +
→This Article is so flawed it makes my head spin
Is that an encyclopedic definition, suitable for an educational resource? I am not going to make any changes, because I do not want to be banned, but I can suggest a general definition for a leftist: "Someone who supports a more egalitarian distribution of wealth". I think all leftists agree with that. Now, as a conservative encyclopedia, you can and should explain the disadvantages of liberalism in the article, but it should also have an objective definition in the first place. --[[User:Quetzalcoatl|Quetzalcoatl]] 20:20, 5 August 2009 (EDT)
Is that an encyclopedic definition, suitable for an educational resource? I am not going to make any changes, because I do not want to be banned, but I can suggest a general definition for a leftist: "Someone who supports a more egalitarian distribution of wealth". I think all leftists agree with that. Now, as a conservative encyclopedia, you can and should explain the disadvantages of liberalism in the article, but it should also have an objective definition in the first place. --[[User:Quetzalcoatl|Quetzalcoatl]] 20:20, 5 August 2009 (EDT)
I'm confused at how you can complain about the left-wing bias in wikipedia, and then support the biased opinions made in this article. Wikipedia, if left-oriented at all, at least has the decency to define republicans and conservatives in a non-childish manner, and if you're meant to be taken seriously, you should show some maturity and do the same. However, if you meant you're creating a more conservative version of wikipedia in that you are presenting a page that laughs at the facts and presents unfounded "opinions" as facts, much like your beloved Fox News Network, then i suppose you've done a good job.--[[User:Asyra|Asyra]] 15:51, 9 December 2009 (EST)
== Picture ==
== Picture ==