Changes

Line 93: Line 93:     
:Edmund, proper grammar is "no better THAN a dictionary," not "no better then a dictionary."  But we're obviously teaching and learning and not trying to be a dictionary, so your point remains unclear.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:15, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 
:Edmund, proper grammar is "no better THAN a dictionary," not "no better then a dictionary."  But we're obviously teaching and learning and not trying to be a dictionary, so your point remains unclear.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:15, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
Edmund. As a general rule, we try to be concise. But I don't anybody is trying to say that none of our articles need expansion. We welcome any substantive addition that you may have up your sleeve. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 09:24, 13 December 2009 (EST)
 +
    
:Aschlafly, what's your criterion for ''being helpful''? You wrote earlier ''ComedyFan, I've personally taught nearly 200 teenagers, and 10 or 100 times as many have benefited from our materials here. Take a look at the page views on my lectures. They are in the many thousands for each lecture. '' Being top in the google ranks indicates that wikipedias's page on  - for instance - '''calciumcarbonat''' was visited many times. So many people benefited from this material, ergo wikipedia ''is'' helpful.
 
:Aschlafly, what's your criterion for ''being helpful''? You wrote earlier ''ComedyFan, I've personally taught nearly 200 teenagers, and 10 or 100 times as many have benefited from our materials here. Take a look at the page views on my lectures. They are in the many thousands for each lecture. '' Being top in the google ranks indicates that wikipedias's page on  - for instance - '''calciumcarbonat''' was visited many times. So many people benefited from this material, ergo wikipedia ''is'' helpful.