Changes

::: Well, I'm not about to buy Dawkins' book, so I don't know the "details" of the evidence he's presenting, but you might want to look at [[baraminology]], look up the distinctions between micro- and macro- evolution, etc.  Various sets of animals have extremely similar DNA because they're descended from the same baramins, or ''types'' that were on the Ark.  Corruption of genetic information produces microevolution - speciation within those types, leaving a genetic footprint in the form of similarities which can be found through the study of comparative DNA.  Genesis establishes that God spoke all beings into existence, with distinctly ''one'' creation event and ''one'' common language.  This prediction is proven as all beings share DNA, protein chirality, etc.  And as God's creation is parsimonious, we see great efficiency throughout creation in the reuse of ingenious parts. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 12:37, 13 December 2009 (EST)

::: Well, I'm not about to buy Dawkins' book, so I don't know the "details" of the evidence he's presenting, but you might want to look at [[baraminology]], look up the distinctions between micro- and macro- evolution, etc.  Various sets of animals have extremely similar DNA because they're descended from the same baramins, or ''types'' that were on the Ark.  Corruption of genetic information produces microevolution - speciation within those types, leaving a genetic footprint in the form of similarities which can be found through the study of comparative DNA.  Genesis establishes that God spoke all beings into existence, with distinctly ''one'' creation event and ''one'' common language.  This prediction is proven as all beings share DNA, protein chirality, etc.  And as God's creation is parsimonious, we see great efficiency throughout creation in the reuse of ingenious parts. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 12:37, 13 December 2009 (EST)

:::: And this genetic similarity, this "reuse", is exactly the opposite of what we'd see if evolution were possible.  If life could come from nothing, you wouldn't expect the same thing to keep coming up the same way every time.  [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 12:44, 13 December 2009 (EST)

:::: And this genetic similarity, this "reuse", is exactly the opposite of what we'd see if evolution were possible.  If life could come from nothing, you wouldn't expect the same thing to keep coming up the same way every time.  [[User:DanielPulido|DanielPulido]] 12:44, 13 December 2009 (EST)