Changes

Line 48: Line 48:     
With http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v17/i3/bacteria.asp, this is a secondary source itself offering an interpretation of several articles. http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/why-scientists-should-not-dismiss-intelligent-design/ is a blog that is a tetrirary source itself - it is reporting on a news article and is presenting opinions.  Please cite primary sources and be prepared to give an analysis of them yourself to show how they support the argument. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 
With http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v17/i3/bacteria.asp, this is a secondary source itself offering an interpretation of several articles. http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/why-scientists-should-not-dismiss-intelligent-design/ is a blog that is a tetrirary source itself - it is reporting on a news article and is presenting opinions.  Please cite primary sources and be prepared to give an analysis of them yourself to show how they support the argument. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 19:06, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
:Needless to say, they are not my citations.  I'd be happy if they were dropped.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 19:07, 29 March 2007 (EDT)
1,660

edits