Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 390:
Line 390: + +
Talk:Best of the public (view source)
Revision as of 19:53, December 27, 2009
, 19:53, December 27, 2009→Question: Why is it necessary for anyone to "decide"? No one "decides", for example, who wins the gold medal in the 100-meter dash at the Olympics, or whether 2+2=4
Happy 2010! --[[User:Evelyn|Evelyn]] 11:53, 27 December 2009 (EST)
Happy 2010! --[[User:Evelyn|Evelyn]] 11:53, 27 December 2009 (EST)
: Interesting comment, but isn't your suggested focus on "who decides" illustrative of the problem with experts? Why is it necessary for anyone to "decide"? No one "decides" for everyone else, for example, who wins the gold medal in the 100-meter dash at the Olympics, or whether 2+2=4.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:53, 27 December 2009 (EST)