Changes

Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)

Revision as of 14:18, December 30, 2009

1,339 bytes added , 14:18, December 30, 2009

→‎No Objectivity: new section

Line 545: Line 545:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&refer=politics&sid=anw8dtE3kyvA

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3602710.ece

+

== No Objectivity ==

+

Look, there are valid criticisms of Obama that need to be covered, and Wikipedia doesn't cover, but this article doesn't make an attempt to be objective. It's just a collection of attacks on Obama. I mean, come on, the first section is on ACORN? Really? And how far down do you have to scroll to get to info on his life, career, and presidential campaigns? This article needs a top-down re-writing with an attempt to be objective - state details about his life and career, and determine the most major and well-sourced criticisms and include them. Maybe lump all the minor criticisms into a minor controversies section or something and give their best sources.

+

This though is absolutely ridiculous. I want to find an alternative to Wikipedia that will fairly cover the controversies surrounding Obama that Wikipedia won't, but at this point, anything I provide will simply be written off by anyone who's not a conservative because of how many questionable claims are being made in the article with poor sourcing! I am genuinely hoping others here will reform this article so it's written with at least some level of objectivity, because otherwise, nobody but conservatives, and probably not even all that many of them, will take it seriously. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 09:18, 30 December 2009 (EST)

JZambrano

SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit

1,134

edits