| Line 188: |
Line 188: |
| | | | |
| | --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:31, 31 December 2009 (EST) | | --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 02:31, 31 December 2009 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :Good suggestions. Doing an analysis now on opinions by Thomas, Scalia and Alito, will start a section for that below. I wonder whether Ron Paul AND the Tea Party Movement earn two spots in the top for the ENTIRE decade. Glenn Beck is late on the scene ... perhaps the next decade? But obviously there is room for disagreement here. |
| | | | |
| | == celebrating vulgar unchristian crap == | | == celebrating vulgar unchristian crap == |
| | | | |
| | CP really should not be celebrating extremely vulgar, violent, gross unchristian crap, in my opinion. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 07:31, 31 December 2009 (EST) | | CP really should not be celebrating extremely vulgar, violent, gross unchristian crap, in my opinion. [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 07:31, 31 December 2009 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | :I agree. What does this refer to?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:45, 31 December 2009 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | == Three Justices == |
| | + | |
| | + | From 2000 to present: |
| | + | |
| | + | :opinions for the Court by Justice Scalia: 88 |
| | + | :opinions for the Court by Justice Thomas: 80 |
| | + | :opinions for the Court by Justice Alito: ?? (much less due to his shorter tenure) |
| | + | |
| | + | (please add to analysis--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:45, 31 December 2009 (EST)) |
| | | | |
| | == Ron Paul, hands down == | | == Ron Paul, hands down == |
| | | | |
| | Sorry, couldn't resist. I've been following this article and many candidates are worthy, but [[Ron Paul]] deserves the title. Scalia would be a good choice too. The decision should be made on the basis of ''influence and inspiration''. In Christ, --[[User:KellyPL|KellyPL]] 09:42, 31 December 2009 (EST) | | Sorry, couldn't resist. I've been following this article and many candidates are worthy, but [[Ron Paul]] deserves the title. Scalia would be a good choice too. The decision should be made on the basis of ''influence and inspiration''. In Christ, --[[User:KellyPL|KellyPL]] 09:42, 31 December 2009 (EST) |