Changes

m
Line 220: Line 220:  
::*''Good News Club v. Milford Central School'' (2001), limiting application of the Establishment Clause to its constitutional basis and holding in favor of free speech rights for religious expression; picked up Justice Breyer as a sixth vote in this important area; followed in 1065 cases, plus 26 distinguishing.
 
::*''Good News Club v. Milford Central School'' (2001), limiting application of the Establishment Clause to its constitutional basis and holding in favor of free speech rights for religious expression; picked up Justice Breyer as a sixth vote in this important area; followed in 1065 cases, plus 26 distinguishing.
   −
::*'''National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet''' (2005), establishing the "hands off" policy for the FCC with respect to the internet, in affirming the free-market approach taken by the Bush Administration (Justice Scalia dissented on formalistic grounds)
+
::*''National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet'' (2005), establishing the "hands off" policy for the FCC with respect to the internet, in affirming the free-market approach taken by the Bush Administration (Justice Scalia dissented on formalistic grounds)
    
::*wrote a concurrence to Justice Scalia's Court opinion in ''Johanns v. Livestock Mktg Ass'n'', emphasizing that "The government may not, consistent with the First Amendment, associate individuals or organizations involuntarily with speech by attributing an unwanted message to them, whether or not those individuals fund the speech, and whether or not the message is under the government's control."
 
::*wrote a concurrence to Justice Scalia's Court opinion in ''Johanns v. Livestock Mktg Ass'n'', emphasizing that "The government may not, consistent with the First Amendment, associate individuals or organizations involuntarily with speech by attributing an unwanted message to them, whether or not those individuals fund the speech, and whether or not the message is under the government's control."
   −
::*Original thinking about Stare decisis which the liberals hate. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31117-2004Oct13.html]
+
::*Original thinking about [[stare decisis]] which the liberals hate. [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31117-2004Oct13.html]
    
::*Great Opinions by Thomas: Mitchell v. Helms, Good News Club v. Milford Central School, City of Indianapolis v. Edmond.
 
::*Great Opinions by Thomas: Mitchell v. Helms, Good News Club v. Milford Central School, City of Indianapolis v. Edmond.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,531

edits