Changes

Since the article doesn't explain how the sphere is split, we'd better describe it as a '''claim''' made by certain parties, much as the claim made by [[AGW]] supporters that their [[global climate model]]s explain or predict anything. Since GCMs have never been explained in any encyclopedia article I've read, I assume they are too esoteric for us laymen to understand (or check). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 19:15, 4 January 2010 (EST)

Since the article doesn't explain how the sphere is split, we'd better describe it as a '''claim''' made by certain parties, much as the claim made by [[AGW]] supporters that their [[global climate model]]s explain or predict anything. Since GCMs have never been explained in any encyclopedia article I've read, I assume they are too esoteric for us laymen to understand (or check). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ^{[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]} 19:15, 4 January 2010 (EST)

:Not at all.  I can have a complete description of the Banach-Tarski paradox up by tonight which will be accessible to anybody who understands irrational numbers.  I'll try and have it up by tonight.

:Not at all.  I can have a complete description of the Banach-Tarski paradox up by tonight which will be accessible to anybody who understands irrational numbers.  I'll try and have it up by tonight. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 19:30, 4 January 2010 (EST)