Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Debate:Does bias impair Wikipedia's reliability?
(view source)
Revision as of 20:23, December 27, 2006
120 bytes added
,
20:23, December 27, 2006
no edit summary
Line 2:
Line 2:
Could you please give me an example of their liberal bias? I use Wikipedia all the time and it's always a reliable and in-depth encyclopedia.
Could you please give me an example of their liberal bias? I use Wikipedia all the time and it's always a reliable and in-depth encyclopedia.
+
+
+
'''Reply: There are some examples for you [[Wikipedia|here]]. Have a great day!
+
--[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 15:23, 27 December 2006 (EST)'''
== Yes: ==
== Yes: ==
Line 7:
Line 11:
They censor non-Christian stuff. They're really really biased. They only accept LIBERAL BIAS!
They censor non-Christian stuff. They're really really biased. They only accept LIBERAL BIAS!
−
You can write more reasons
[[Wikipedia]]
is a bad here
.
+
Please read this:
[[Wikipedia]].
SharonS
Block, SkipCaptcha, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
5,655
edits
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Log in
Namespaces
Article
talk page
Variants
Views
Read
View source
View history
More
Search
Popular Links
Main Page
Recent changes
New Pages
Random page
Statistics
Edit Console
Special pages
Printable version