| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | + | {{welcome|sig=<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:36, 16 February 2010 (EST)}} |
| | + | |
| | Lifelong Catholic. Hardcore conservative. | | Lifelong Catholic. Hardcore conservative. |
| | I will fight for factual accuracy even if it is unappreciated or gets me kicked out of here. | | I will fight for factual accuracy even if it is unappreciated or gets me kicked out of here. |
| | + | |
| | + | == Factual accuracy == |
| | | | |
| | Factual accuracy is good, and will be appreciated but making [[personal remarks]] will get you kicked out. Also, try to distinguish between [[Debate Topics|debating]] and working on articles. If you have an idea to improve an article, propose it in a humble way, rather than in an overbearing or offensive way. It's not what you say, it's how you say it. | | Factual accuracy is good, and will be appreciated but making [[personal remarks]] will get you kicked out. Also, try to distinguish between [[Debate Topics|debating]] and working on articles. If you have an idea to improve an article, propose it in a humble way, rather than in an overbearing or offensive way. It's not what you say, it's how you say it. |
| Line 9: |
Line 13: |
| | ::Facts are as facts do, JeffT. Talk to 100 scientists and you will get 100 different responses, all slightly different than the others. Same with linguists and translations. We are a [[U.S.]], [[conservative]] and [[Christian]] project. Editors accepting our POV are welcome, those who do not, are not so much. If you wish the same type of fact-obscuring encyclopedia as [[Wikipedia]] your efforts might be better accepted there. If you come here with the idea you are here to "save us" from ourselves, your mission has already failed. I urge you to open your mind to the truth...it will set you free! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:48, 16 February 2010 (EST) | | ::Facts are as facts do, JeffT. Talk to 100 scientists and you will get 100 different responses, all slightly different than the others. Same with linguists and translations. We are a [[U.S.]], [[conservative]] and [[Christian]] project. Editors accepting our POV are welcome, those who do not, are not so much. If you wish the same type of fact-obscuring encyclopedia as [[Wikipedia]] your efforts might be better accepted there. If you come here with the idea you are here to "save us" from ourselves, your mission has already failed. I urge you to open your mind to the truth...it will set you free! --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 16:48, 16 February 2010 (EST) |
| | :::TK, if you could help me understand these problems, I would very much appreciate it. I really dont understand what is going on. The facts are: It is '''not''' a fact that Amy Bisbop murdered her brother. It is a fact that the article is about a particular type of murder. It is a fact that Amy Bishop is not young. Could you please help me? Thanks, [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 17:07, 16 February 2010 (EST) | | :::TK, if you could help me understand these problems, I would very much appreciate it. I really dont understand what is going on. The facts are: It is '''not''' a fact that Amy Bisbop murdered her brother. It is a fact that the article is about a particular type of murder. It is a fact that Amy Bishop is not young. Could you please help me? Thanks, [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 17:07, 16 February 2010 (EST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::My IM contact information is listed at the top of my user page, Jeff. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 19:36, 16 February 2010 (EST) |