Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Objections: remove statement designed to make atheists look more logical etc, added truthful statement on how ridiculous their view is
Line 101: Line 101:     
* This argument fails to address [[gestalt consciousness]].
 
* This argument fails to address [[gestalt consciousness]].
* [[Evolutionists]] typically deny that consciousness is a spirit or soul, assuming that it is simply the workings of a highly-developed nervous system.  Without any evidence or logical account for how this could have possibly happened, they deny the existence of a creator and insist that the physical nervous system would somehow evolve from a [[Primordial Soup|primordial soup]] and consciousness would somehow pop into existence.
+
* [[Evolutionists]] Evolutionists typically argue that consciousness may happen by chance, and that for this reason, the argument is invalid. However, this is highly illogical and unlikely, so is yet another weak argument for atheism.
 
* Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics.
 
* Infinite regress is allowable both in modern mathematics and physics.
 
* The last point (that the uncaused causer is God) is unsupported unless it is taken as a statement of definition.  If this is the case, the prior arguments are unnecessary.
 
* The last point (that the uncaused causer is God) is unsupported unless it is taken as a statement of definition.  If this is the case, the prior arguments are unnecessary.
66

edits

Navigation menu