Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reply: "Yes, and some results are noted in the table"
Line 59: Line 59:  
:::::''But as to the examples you've disputed, if I did a search on Supreme Court opinions and found that conservative Justices used those words more often than liberal Justices do, then you would you concede that they belong on the list?''
 
:::::''But as to the examples you've disputed, if I did a search on Supreme Court opinions and found that conservative Justices used those words more often than liberal Justices do, then you would you concede that they belong on the list?''
 
:::::Just curious: Has this test be done for any of the words? [[User:PhilG|PhilG]] 11:23, 2 March 2010 (EST)
 
:::::Just curious: Has this test be done for any of the words? [[User:PhilG|PhilG]] 11:23, 2 March 2010 (EST)
 +
 +
:::::: Yes, and some results are noted in the table.  Of course, some of the words are self-evidently conservative (e.g., "conservative" or "self-defense"), and other words are unlikely to ever appear in a Supreme Court opinion (e.g., "action-at-a-distance".--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:50, 2 March 2010 (EST)
    
== Dramacast? ==
 
== Dramacast? ==
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795

edits

Navigation menu