Changes

Line 7: Line 7:  
Shoulden't this also mention that Lamarck's theory was basicaly abandoned after Darwin? [[User:Fred59|Fred59]] 02:18, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
 
Shoulden't this also mention that Lamarck's theory was basicaly abandoned after Darwin? [[User:Fred59|Fred59]] 02:18, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
   −
== Lamarck and atheism? ==
+
== Lamarck and atheism? - Rod Weathers edit ==
    
'''Anti Lamarck being an atheist:
 
'''Anti Lamarck being an atheist:
Line 23: Line 23:  
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7261/full/461167c.html
 
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7261/full/461167c.html
   −
Any other information would be most welcome.
+
Any other information would be most welcome. I will add that Rod Weathers was a parodist who appears to have made some accurate postings to Conservapedia and he put in the Lamarck was an atheist post.  
    
[[User:Conservative|conservative]] 19:23, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
 
[[User:Conservative|conservative]] 19:23, 8 April 2010 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,794

edits