Conservapedia

Changes

Talk:Axiom of Choice (view source)

Revision as of 01:35, April 12, 2010

159 bytes added ,  01:35, April 12, 2010
Reversion explained
Line 189: Line 189:     
:::Now what I am proposing - and I'll probably move this thread to the appropriate page - is that we focus on the first 2 or 3 levels before spending too much time on the upper couple of levels. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:32, 6 December 2008 (EST)
 
:::Now what I am proposing - and I'll probably move this thread to the appropriate page - is that we focus on the first 2 or 3 levels before spending too much time on the upper couple of levels. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:32, 6 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== Reversion explained ==
 +
 +
One does not have to "negate" the Axiom of Choice in order to reject its use in rigorous proofs.
 +
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
 +
<references/>
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/768711"