Conservapedia

Changes

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 04:33, April 1, 2007

268 bytes added ,  04:33, April 1, 2007
→‎Downright Untruth
Line 352: Line 352:  
::::::'''it is absolutely CHURLISH''' not to acknowledge that "Wikipedia" or more strictly the Wikimedia Foundation has not made Conservapedia (and most other WIki-based sites) a great and generous '''gift''' in the form of the Mediawiki software.  
 
::::::'''it is absolutely CHURLISH''' not to acknowledge that "Wikipedia" or more strictly the Wikimedia Foundation has not made Conservapedia (and most other WIki-based sites) a great and generous '''gift''' in the form of the Mediawiki software.  
 
:::::Fair is fair. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::Fair is fair. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: In response to Sid above, does he know why Fortran was written?  Why UNIX was written?  Why C was written?  I doubt Sid expects everyone to credit the ''motivation'' of those projects when using those tools.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:33, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
    
==CE is not an example of bias==
 
==CE is not an example of bias==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,500

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/78749"