Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], [[P.J. Crowley]], and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support<ref> http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref> <ref> http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref>. It appears that [[liberal|liberals]] either have no interest in or have difficulty in reading the law. For this reason, here are the full 16 pages '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' that way liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. It can be read on [[Fox News]] online<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf</ref>, but now, it can be read here too '''word for word''' including in whatever parts of the bill are in caps or not. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, racial profiling. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref> http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.
+
[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], [[P.J. Crowley]], and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support<ref> http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref> <ref> http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref>. It appears that [[liberal|liberals]] are ignorant in or have difficulty in reading the law. The purpose and goal of this article is not to give a comprehensive history of the bill, but so that everyone, especially liberals, can read and understand the bill and things related to the bill. Here are the full 16 pages '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' (also known as '''Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act''' that way liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. It can be read on [[Fox News]] online<ref> http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf</ref>, but now, it can be read here too '''word for word''' including in whatever parts of the bill are in caps or not. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, racial profiling. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref> http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.
    
==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==
 
==The contents of Arizona Senate Bill 1070==
Line 804: Line 804:  
==== The Secure Communities Program ====
 
==== The Secure Communities Program ====
   −
According to the [[Christian Science Monitor]], there’s a little-noticed federal enforcement program known as “[[Secure Communities]].” It is susceptible to [[racial profiling]] and a lack of due process in the jailing and deportation of illegal aliens. It’s a program that has potentially far-reaching consequences if not properly managed. In the rush to tackle [[immigration]], and in the wrong hands, it could turn into a mass deportation program.
+
The [[Christian Science Monitor]] reports that there’s a little-noticed federal enforcement program known as “[[Secure Communities]].” It is susceptible to [[racial profiling]] and a lack of due process in the jailing and deportation of illegal aliens. It’s a program that has potentially far-reaching consequences if not properly managed. In the rush to tackle [[immigration]], and in the wrong hands, it could turn into a mass deportation program.
 
The program is intended to target “criminal aliens” – undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of serious felonies like rape, murder, or even immigrant smuggling, and who are already serving time in jail. It’s not meant to be used in routine law enforcement against persons stopped for traffic violations or accused of lesser crimes who later turn out to be illegal aliens.
 
The program is intended to target “criminal aliens” – undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of serious felonies like rape, murder, or even immigrant smuggling, and who are already serving time in jail. It’s not meant to be used in routine law enforcement against persons stopped for traffic violations or accused of lesser crimes who later turn out to be illegal aliens.
 
But the federal government’s own data suggests that this is exactly what’s occurring. Cooperating jurisdictions simply run the names and fingerprints of all persons being booked after arrest through a federal database of illegal aliens. If there’s a “hit,” the suspect is detained and referred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for possible deportation.  
 
But the federal government’s own data suggests that this is exactly what’s occurring. Cooperating jurisdictions simply run the names and fingerprints of all persons being booked after arrest through a federal database of illegal aliens. If there’s a “hit,” the suspect is detained and referred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for possible deportation.  
Line 853: Line 853:     
If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?
 
If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?
 +
 +
A member of the Somalian Al Shabaab terrorist group may be trying to get into Texas through Mexico. U.S. Homeland Security has asked law enforcement in Houston to be on the lookout for a suspected member of Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida ally based in Somalia<ref> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37368665 </ref>  <ref> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSrvfP_Ua8 </ref>. With this in mind, do you prefer Arizona’s new enforcement law against illegal immigration over terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States? Or do you prefer terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States over Arizona’s enforcement law against illegal immigration? Which of the 2 options would you pick if you had to and why?
    
Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?
 
Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?
389

edits